2023-05-19T23:45:36Z - 2024-05-19T23:45:36Z
Overview
7 Pull requests merged by 1 user
Merged
#24 Add initial motivations section
Merged
#19 Add introduction
Merged
#23 Add infrastructure section and clean up the attester connection
Merged
#18 Add requirement to only be enabled in secure context
Merged
#22 Fix IDL validation failure
Merged
#21 Add github workflow to publish to gh-pages branch
Merged
#17 Update alternative spec to be considered working draft
11 Pull requests proposed by 1 user
Proposed
#29 Clarify language
Proposed
#34 Fix major API design/security flaw: Denial of service on large quantity of users
Proposed
#35 fix: introduce alternate attestation API implementation (resolves #28)
Proposed
#39 remove some of the more problematic elemtents of this proposal
Proposed
#56 Delete explainer.md
Proposed
#59 mention the primary use-case: adblock detection
Proposed
#75 Update explainer.md
Proposed
#76 Fixing problems
Proposed
#81 Clarify some uncertainties about the intend
Proposed
#82 Use simpler language in explainer (improved by AI)
Proposed
#91 Clarify explainer
6 Issues closed from 1 user
Closed
#55 You should kill yourself...
Closed
#48 do not
Closed
#52 hm today i will propose this very useful web standard that will surely work out with no backlash whatsoever
Closed
#50 STOP
Closed
#7 Proposing CBOR for the token format
Closed
#9 Secure Context only
58 Issues created by 1 user
Opened
#16 Attestation holdback
Opened
#20 What should the attester identity be?
Opened
#25 Provide an example of validating tokens
Opened
#26 What error codes should be thrown?
Opened
#27 Include content binding hash type in the EnvironmentIntegrity response?
Opened
#28 Don't.
Opened
#30 Compatibility with GDPR article 22
Opened
#31 What does this proposed API provide?
Opened
#32 Questions of Necessity for Proposal
Opened
#33 The advertising use case for this creates risks for users
Opened
#36 Compare privacy claims vs anti-fingerprinting techniques
Opened
#37 Will accessibility tools be blocked or banned?
Opened
#38 no don't pls thanks :3
Opened
#40 Does not explain what the costs of restricting fraud are
Opened
#41 Does not address fake actors at all
Opened
#42 No real justification why challenges aren’t enough
Opened
#43 Confusion between client and user authentication
Opened
#44 Proposal entirely skips how attestors are supposed to actually function?
Opened
#45 This will make the web stupid, and it will be wholly ineffective
Opened
#46 User Research?
Opened
#47 This idea is bad and you should feel bad
Opened
#49 Google Bordering on Antitrust
Opened
#51 Do not listen to ad blocking addicts, please ship this ASAP
Opened
#53 Would it be that hard not to create oppressive web standards that provide no real world benefit?
Opened
#54 So... locking down browser and OSs that only support DRM wasn't enough?
Opened
#57 Please don't do this
Opened
#58 Cease Immediately
Opened
#60 Keep the World Wide Web an open platform
Opened
#61 Feature request: block copy and pasting
Opened
#62 Have you learned nothing from the failure of AMP?
Opened
#63 Could you guys please stop trying to create a 1984 dystopia every 5 minutes?
Opened
#64 This is an awful idea
Opened
#65 Feature Request: Whitelisted Websites
Opened
#66 "Constructive" involvement is not ethical when the goal is harmful
Opened
#67 Terrible idea.
Opened
#68 Extremely important suggestion
Opened
#69 This is horrid.
Opened
#70 fuck no bruh
Opened
#71 replace the internet with ads
Opened
#72 are you guys going trick or treating?
Opened
#73 begone
Opened
#74 No
Opened
#77 Rethink this.
Opened
#78 How do you ensure the modified and browsers with extensions or development tools can be used?
Opened
#79 Dishonest cretins. Liars. How much are they paying you to sell what little integrity you have?
Opened
#80 This will definitely stop bad actors
Opened
#83 Keep Yourself Safe
Opened
#84 have you tried having good ideas instead of bad ones
Opened
#85 interesting idea, have you considered...
Opened
#86 Some thoughts on how this project could coexist with an open web
Opened
#87 My thoughts on this proposal, and how this could help the web.
Opened
#88 Why step so low?
Opened
#89 How to delete someone else's repository
Opened
#90 the toilet is in the other room
Opened
#92 "i wonder".
Opened
#93 Feature request: block websites entirely
Opened
#94 Feature request: remove all other non-Google useragents from client devices
Opened
#95 Look.
11 Unresolved Conversations
Open
#5
holdbacks diminish the value of the proposal and don't protect browser diversity
Open
#11
What extra fingerprinting does this allow?
Open
#13
RFC 8890 Compliance
Open
#15
Surveillance by Attester concerns
Open
#14
Who determines what Attesters are acceptable?
Open
#4
can this proposal facilitate integrity of the running script?
Open
#2
"device identifier" could be per-origin; would that alleviate concerns?
Open
#8
explainer assumes the existence of a base64 encoder
Open
#12
investigating the causes of unexpected integrity attestation failures
Open
#6
HTTP client hints
Open
#3
tokens bound to the device